(877) 781-1570Call Now! Available 24/7
Free Immediate Response!
Eisner Gorin LLP
TOP 1% U.S. CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAW FIRM
  • All Criminal and DUI Defense:
    Before Court, Trials and Appeals
  • State-Bar Certified Criminal Law Specialists
  • Over 60 Years Courtroom Trial Experience
  • Adjunct Professor, UCLA and Pepperdine Law
  • Former Senior Deputy District Attorney
  • Private Investigation Available 24/7
  • Offices in Century City and Van Nuys
Aggressive Criminal Defense in State & Federal Court
SuperLawyers Top 2.5% Law Firm Former District Attorney
Pre-Eminent Law Firm Certified Criminal Law Specialist
Dmitry Gorin Rated Best Lawyers in United States Rated Best Lawyers in United States
Alan Eisner
Dmitry Gorin
Meryl Chambers






Plea Agreements in Federal Criminal Courts

Plea Agreements in Federal Criminal Cases

Plea bargains are a formal agreement between defendant and federal prosecutor where the defendant will plead guilty in exchange for reduced charges, or to receive a lighter sentence.

 

Plea agreements provide some benefits for both parties. For the federal prosecutor, it means they are resolving the case without all the time and expense of a trial. For a defendant, it means they will typically receive a lighter sentence, or have some charges reduced or dismissed.

 

Plea bargaining in federal criminal cases are not the same as reaching a plea deal in a state-level case. There are different laws, rules, and certain considerations in federal criminal cases. Federal judges also have wide discretion when imposing the actual sentence.

 

In state-level criminal court cases, plea agreements are often made orally and then put on the record with a simple waiver of rights form being the only formal written record of the terms and defendant’s understanding of the deal they are taking.

 

However, federal criminal cases which resolve by plea agreement often feature lengthy written documents which spell out in great detail the factual admissions the defendant is making, the rights the defendant and the government are agreeing to waive or give up, the agreement of the parties as to sentencing, and other information. 

 

Also, a federal plea deal is not always the final word. Defendants need to understand that the sentencing range that was agreed upon by the federal prosecutor is only a recommendation to the judge. This article reviews some of the unique features of plea agreements in federal criminal cases.

 

Federal Prosecutor Drafts a Plea Agreement

When the parties in a federal criminal case decide to resolve the dispute by way of a negotiated plea, the government drafts a plea agreement for the defendant and their attorney to sign. This is one of the most important documents in a federal criminal case and is the subject of lengthy negotiation between the parties. 

 

The first feature of a federal plea agreement is the charge or charges to which the defendant is agreeing to plead guilty. 

 

These charges may be among the charges contained in the indictment, assuming one has already been filed against the defendant, or can be different charges which the parties agree to substitute in the interests of justice. The defendant may also be required to admit certain enhancements.

 

Factual Basis Portion of the Agreement

One of the most important features in the federal plea agreement which has a substantial impact at sentencing is the factual basis portion of the agreement. In this section, the government and the defendant agree to a specific factual scenario which lays out the defendant’s unlawful conduct, usually in significant detail. 

 

The factual basis will likely include the defendant’s mental state – what did the defendant know? What did the defendant intend? How did the defendant plan to benefit from the unlawful conduct to which they are pleading? The factual basis also critically contains stipulations about the loss amount, if any, caused by the crime. 

 

In white collar cases or those involving theft or fraud, this is a critical factor which can radically change the presumptive sentence the defendant will receive at sentencing based on an application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines

 

Often, the parties cannot agree on a specific amount so they will stipulate to a range and reserve the right to argue for a higher or lower loss amount at the time of sentencing and leave the ultimate determination up to the judge.

 

Waiver of Certain Appellate Rights

A federal plea agreement also almost always contains waivers of certain appellate rights.  A typical formulation is as follows: The government agrees not to appeal the sentence imposed by the judge provided that it is over X months. The defendant agrees not to appeal the sentence imposed by the judge provided that it is under Y months. 

 

In this way, through a “limited mutual waiver of appeal,” the parties have agreed that the judgment will be final and neither party will seek to displace the plea by way of appeal unless the judge imposes a sentence that is substantially outside of the range contemplated by the parties. 

 

This concept of a sentencing range is important especially in federal court as a federal judge at sentencing is not bound by the parties’ expectations of what the sentence should be. The judge can depart higher or lower from the guidelines range, and is not bound to impose a sentence requested by either party.

 

Sentencing Factors

The plea agreement also importantly contains the parties’ agreement about which sentencing factors apply under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

 

 As federal judges take the guidelines provisions very seriously, even though they are advisory only, this portion of the plea agreement is also critical. 

 

The parties will often stipulate to a base offense level, enhancements for specific offense conduct, a criminal history category based on the defendant’s prior record, and any departures or variances which the parties can mutually agree are appropriate. 

 

Again, the judge is not legally bound by these determinations as they are not a party to the agreement. Nevertheless, most judges will give weight to the parties’ agreement as they are more familiar with the facts of the case and presumably have come to an agreement based on lengthy discussions including of evidence in the case which is not apparent on the face of the plea agreement.

 

Most Federal Cases Result in a Plea Agreement

It should be noted that federal criminal cases that proceed to a trial and a verdict are pretty rare. The vast majority of convictions in a federal criminal court are the result of a guilty plea.

 

It’s not uncommon for a federal prosecutor to initiate a conservation in order to discuss a plea bargain. Their decision to reach out for a deal is based on numerous factors, including the strength of evidence on the case. It’s also not uncommon for a federal prosecutor to charge a defendant with the most serious offense possible in order to motivate a defendant to plead guilty to a lesser charge through a plea agreement.

 

Through plea agreements, federal prosecutors can obtain a guilty plea without a trial and defendants can greatly reduce their chances of a lengthy federal prison sentence.

 

If you are under a federal criminal investigation, or already charged with a federal crime, you need to consult with a federal criminal lawyer to discuss legal options. Your chances of obtaining a favorable deal are much greater when you have experienced legal representation.

 

Federal plea bargaining is a long and involved process which is crucial for maximizing the chances of a successful outcome for a federal criminal defendant. Contact our experienced team of federal criminal defense attorneys for an initial consultation and more information about federal plea agreements.

 

Eisner Gorin LLP is a top-ranked criminal defense law firm located at 1875 Century Park E #705, Los Angeles, CA 90067 and 14401 Sylvan St #112 Van Nuys, CA 91401. Contact our firm for a consultation at (310) 328-3776.