EDD Fraud

EDD Fraud in CA - Unemployment Insurance Code 2101 UIC

California law is very strict regarding honesty in receiving unemployment benefits. The California Employment Development Department (EDD) aggressively pursues individuals suspected of unlawfully obtaining benefits.

It is a crime (EDD fraud) to provide false information, withhold facts, or use fake IDs to obtain unemployment benefits.

California's Unemployment Insurance Code (UIC) 2101 penalizes intentionally providing false information, concealing facts, or using fake IDs to obtain unemployment benefits.

Violations can lead to serious consequences, including jail time, fines over $20,000, repayment of benefits, and disqualification from future claims.

Penalties range from misdemeanor jail sentences to felony imprisonment, particularly in cases involving large COVID-era schemes.

If you are facing accusations of unemployment insurance fraud (also known as EDD fraud, not only will you have to make restitution for the funds you obtained unlawfully, but you could also face up to three years in prison.

A skilled California criminal defense attorney can implement key defense strategies to minimize or eliminate the risk of these penalties.

Key Takeaways

According to California Unemployment Insurance Code § 2101, it is a criminal offense to provide false statements, omit material facts, or use false identification to modify any benefit or payment.
Unemployment insurance fraud, also known as "EDD fraud," can be prosecuted as a felony or a misdemeanor.
California's unemployment insurance fraud laws govern both employees and employers.
Examples of EDD fraud by employers include misrepresenting why a former employee was terminated, exaggerating or hiding earnings to evade unemployment insurance contributions, or deliberately withholding employee deductions and not paying them to the Employment Development Department.

What Does UIC 2101 Say?

CA Unemployment Insurance Code says, "(a) It is a violation of this chapter to willfully make a false statement or representation, to knowingly fail to disclose a material fact, or to use a false name, false social security number, or other false identification to obtain, increase, reduce, or defeat any benefit or payment, whether for the maker or for any other person, under any of the following statutes administered by the department:

(1) The provisions of this division.

(2) The provisions of any unemployment insurance law of the federal government.

(3) The provisions of any training allowance law of the federal government.

(4) The provisions of any trade readjustment allowance law of the federal government.

(5) The provisions of any other allowance law of the federal government.

(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude the applicability of Section 470 of the Penal Code to any acts or omissions which violate this section."

Breaking Down the Statutory Language

Under UIC 2101, it is illegal to willfully make a false statement or representation, knowingly fail to disclose a material fact, or use a false name, false social security number, or other false identification to obtain, increase, reduce, or defeat any benefit or payment.

This statute applies broadly to various benefits administered by the EDD, including:

State unemployment insurance
Disability insurance
Paid family leave
Federal unemployment insurance programs (such as those established during the COVID-19 pandemic)

Essentially, the law prohibits any form of dishonesty intended to manipulate the benefit system.

Whether the alleged act involves inflating your income to receive higher payments or failing to report that you have returned to work while still collecting benefits, these actions fall under the purview of UIC 2101.

What Must Be Proven to Convict You?

Simply making an error on your paperwork is not enough to convict you of EDD fraud. To secure a conviction under UIC 2101, the prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

A false statement or material omission: You must have made a factually incorrect statement or intentionally failed to disclose a "material fact"-information that would have influenced the EDD's decision regarding your benefits. An example is failing to report income while claiming benefits.
Willful and knowing intent: You must have acted willfully, meaning you intentionally made a false statement or withheld information with the specific purpose of deceiving the EDD.
Purpose of obtaining or affecting benefits: The action must have been done for the specific purpose of obtaining, increasing, reducing, or defeating unemployment benefits. False statements about irrelevant details that do not impact benefits do not violate this statute.

Penalties and Consequences

A violation of UIC 2101 is considered a "wobbler" offense. This means the prosecutor has the discretion to charge the crime as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the specifics of the case and your criminal history.

The amount of money involved is usually the deciding factor; higher dollar amounts typically trigger felony charges. If convicted of a misdemeanor violation of UIC 2101, you could face:

Up to one year in county jail; and/or
Fines of up to $20,000.

If charged as a felony, the consequences are significantly more severe:

Imprisonment in state prison for 16 months, two years, or three years; and/or
Fines of up to $20,000.

Beyond jail time and fines, a conviction carries other heavy burdens. You will likely be required to pay restitution, meaning you must pay back the full amount of benefits allegedly obtained fraudulently, often with significant penalties and interest added.

Common Defenses Against EDD Fraud Charges

If you're charged with EDD fraud under UIC 2101, an experienced California criminal defense attorney can implement a variety of defenses to combat the charges. Among the more common include:

Lack of Intent: Since fraud requires specific intent, proving that you did not intend to deceive the EDD is a powerful defense. If you believed the information you provided was accurate, you have not committed fraud. For example, if you honestly believed certain earnings did not need to be reported because of how you interpreted the instructions, your attorney can argue there was no fraudulent intent.
Mistake of Fact: EDD applications can be confusing. It is common for applicants to make errors regarding dates of employment, reasons for termination, or income amounts. If you made a genuine mistake or a typographical error, this defense asserts that the inaccuracy was accidental, not "willful."
Lack of Knowledge: Sometimes, fraud occurs because a third party uses your identity without your consent, or an employer files incorrect information. If you were unaware that false information was submitted under your name, or if you did not know you were required to report a specific fact, you cannot be convicted of willfully making a false statement.

For more information and a case review, contact the criminal defense law firm at Eisner Gorin LLP.

Related Content: