Being accused of a crime is a serious matter that triggers a complex legal process, whether at the state or federal level. A fundamental principle of the United States justice system is that every individual is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Meeting the standard of proof is the prosecution's responsibility. However, your defense attorney plays a crucial role in challenging the prosecution's case, establishing reasonable doubt, and protecting your rights throughout the criminal case process.
This should reassure you that you are not alone in this complex legal process.
When a defendant is summoned to trial, it's vital to be aware of the various ways the prosecutor and judge will approach them. The stakes can be high, so it's crucial to have a lawyer with you and to come prepared.
This preparation will make you feel proactive and ready for the legal battle ahead.
If you've never experienced a trial before, you might not understand courtroom procedures. This lack of understanding can negatively affect the outcome. However, by gaining a comprehensive understanding of the defenses available to you, you can empower yourself to achieve the best possible result or ruling.
While any effective criminal defense strategy will be tailored to the specific facts and circumstances of the case, defense attorneys typically employ one of several specific proven defense approaches, according to which they believe will yield the best outcome for you.
Let's look at the ten most common defense strategies used in criminal trials.
1. Innocence
By far the most prevalent approach, the most direct defense to most crimes is to assert your innocence. This can be presented in two primary ways. The first is a factual defense, where your attorney provides evidence and arguments showing that you did not commit the act in question.
For instance, in a theft case, you might present evidence that you were at a different location when the theft occurred.
This is often referred to as a 'whodunit' defense, where evidence is presented to show another person is responsible or that you were simply not involved.
The second approach is a legal defense, which argues that while you may have committed the act, it does not meet the legal definition of the crime for which you have been charged.
For example, suppose the crime in question requires prosecutors to show willful intent. In that case, your attorney may be able to present evidence to show that your actions were not willful--in which case, you could not be legally convicted of that crime.
2. Self-Defense
The self-defense argument concedes that you committed the act but asserts that you did so justifiably to protect yourself or others from imminent harm.
To be successful, this defense typically requires showing that you had a reasonable belief that you or a loved one was in immediate danger of being harmed and that the force you used was necessary and proportional to the threat you faced.
Similar to self-defense, the criminal justice system might justify violent actions motivated by the need to protect others. A defendant must demonstrate that the circumstances warranted such a response and that it prevented possible harm or death.
3. Alibi
An alibi is a defense based on evidence that you were somewhere else when the crime was committed.
A strong alibi makes it impossible for you to have been the perpetrator. Evidence to support an alibi can include witness testimony from people who were with you, or documentation like credit card receipts, GPS data, or surveillance footage that places you at a different location.
4. Entrapment
Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers or their agents induce a person to commit a crime that they otherwise would not have committed. This defense argues that the idea and impetus for the crime came from the government, not from you.
A successful entrapment defense must demonstrate that you were not predisposed to commit the crime and were persuaded or coerced into it by police conduct. It is not entrapment if law enforcement merely provides an opportunity for a crime to be committed.
5. Duress
The defense of duress, sometimes called coercion, is used when a defendant argues they committed a crime because they were under an immediate threat of serious bodily injury or death.
To use this defense, you must prove that you acted out of a reasonable fear of harm and that there was no reasonable opportunity to escape the situation without committing the crime. The threat must be imminent and directed at you or a loved one.
6. Constitutional Violations
The U.S. Constitution guarantees certain rights to individuals accused of crimes. If law enforcement violates these rights during the investigation or prosecution, it can form the basis of a powerful defense.
Common examples include an illegal search and seizure that violates the Fourth Amendment or a failure to read Miranda rights, which impacts the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
If evidence was obtained illegally, a defense attorney can file a motion to have it suppressed, meaning the prosecution cannot use it against you in court.
7. Statute of Limitations
A statute of limitations is a law that sets a maximum time limit on how long after a crime has been committed the government has to initiate criminal proceedings. If the prosecution files charges after this time window has expired, the case can be dismissed.
The length of the statute of limitations varies depending on the severity of the crime.
8. Insanity Defense
The insanity defense is a complex and rarely used legal defense. It asserts that the defendant should not be held criminally responsible for their actions because, due to a severe mental disease or defect, they were unable to understand the nature of their actions, or that their actions were wrong, at the time the crime was committed.
The legal standards for proving insanity vary significantly between jurisdictions and require extensive psychiatric and psychological evidence. A successful insanity defense typically results in commitment to a mental health facility rather than acquittal.
9. Affirmative Defense
An affirmative defense involves the defendant and attorney providing evidence that challenges the prosecutor's claims. Examples include an alibi or justification, such as self-defense.
An affirmative defense strategy doesn't have to counter every element of a prosecutor's case, but it aims to challenge the accuracy of the most critical aspects of the case. While claiming innocence is a passive defense since it requires the prosecution to prove guilt, an affirmative defense actively seeks to defend an innocent person.
10. Case Cannot be Proven
One of the simplest defenses is that sometimes the State cannot prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Knowing how the court operates, reasonable doubt is often insufficient to convict someone.
When a case is weak, especially with little or no evidence, the best defense might be to provide no defense at all. Ultimately, your attorney might choose to rest the case, leaving it to the court to determine if they can prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
For more information, contact our California criminal defense lawyers at Eisner Gorin LLP in Los Angeles, CA.
Related Content:
If you have one phone call from jail, call us! If you are facing criminal charges,