The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution offers one of the most critical protections for individuals suspected of a crime: the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Specifically, it guarantees that people have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects and that warrants for any search or seizure must be supported by probable cause, sworn under oath, and must particularly describe the place to be searched and the items to be seized.

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.

This constitutional safeguard ensures that law enforcement officials cannot arbitrarily invade your privacy or seize your property without just cause. While these protections are fundamental, they are not always upheld, and violations of Fourth Amendment rights occur more often than many realize.

There are many examples of Fourth Amendment violations, such as police searching someone's home without a warrant or conducting an extensive search of a vehicle during a routine traffic stop without probable cause.

Other examples include seizing personal property without a warrant, arresting someone without probable cause, and accessing personal electronic data like phone records without a warrant.

Some key points about Fourth Amendment violations are unwarranted searches, where law enforcement enters someone's home or vehicle to search for evidence without a valid search warrant, which is a clear violation.

Another is exceeding the scope of a search. Notably, even with a warrant, police cannot search areas beyond what is specified in the warrant. Illegal seizures are defined as taking someone's property without a warrant or reasonable suspicion.

Using excessive force during a traffic stop to detain someone without probable cause can be a Fourth Amendment violation. Wiretapping without a warrant or recording someone's conversations without a court order can also be considered a violation. Let's take a deeper look at some common violations below.

Common Fourth Amendment Violations

The Fourth Amendment says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized."

The Fourth Amendment does not guarantee that all searches and seizures are prohibited, only those that are considered unreasonable under the law.

Despite the legal safeguards outlined in the Fourth Amendment, violations happen with alarming frequency. Some of the most common examples are discussed below. 

Warrantless Searches Without Consent or Probable Cause

One of the clearest violations occurs when law enforcement searches without either a valid warrant or your consent and when there are no applicable exceptions, such as exigent circumstances.

For example, if an officer searches your car or home during a routine stop without your permission or any justification, or if investigators break into your home to search your property, claiming that evidence was in danger of destruction when it was not, this could amount to an unlawful search.

Using Invalid or Overbroad Warrants

A warrant must be specific about what is being searched and seized and must be based on probable cause. Violations occur when:

• The warrant is overly broad, allowing a search of areas or items unrelated to the investigation.
• The warrant was issued without sufficient probable cause.
• The warrant is based on false or misleading information provided by investigators.

If a search is conducted under such invalid warrants, the evidence obtained may be considered illegally obtained.

Unreasonable Use of Surveillance

Surveillance techniques, such as wiretapping or GPS tracking, are often used during criminal investigations. However, these methods typically require a warrant. If law enforcement engages in surveillance without obtaining the proper judicial approval, their actions may constitute a violation. This is especially true when modern technologies are used to intrude upon your reasonable expectation of privacy.

Exceeding the Scope of a Lawful Search

Even when a search warrant is valid, law enforcement is required to stay within its limits. For example, if the warrant allows officers to search your home for stolen electronics, searching through personal documents or unrelated data on your computer could exceed the authorized scope. Similarly, seizing items not explicitly listed on the warrant is unlawful.

Pretextual Stops and Searches

A pretextual stop occurs when law enforcement contrives a pretense to stop you and search your vehicle, such as a minor traffic violation, when they actually intend to investigate a separate matter without the required legal justification. If the real reason for the stop is unrelated and lacks probable cause, any resulting search or evidence could be challenged for violating the Fourth Amendment.

Search Incident to Arrest Without Legal Grounds

While officers can typically search a person and their immediate surroundings after making an arrest, they must have a lawful basis to conduct the arrest in the first place. If the arrest itself is deemed unlawful, any subsequent search may also violate the Fourth Amendment.

Coerced or Manipulated Consent

Law enforcement officials and investigators may ask for your consent to search. If you give your consent, you're effectively waiving your Fourth Amendment rights, and they may search without a warrant. That being said, if investigators use intimidating or deceptive tactics to elicit your consent, that consent is considered "coerced consent" and can be considered a Fourth Amendment violation.

How Attorneys Use Fourth Amendment Violations in Defense

If your Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, a skilled federal criminal defense attorney can leverage these violations to strengthen your defense. Here are some common strategies an attorney can use:

• Filing a Motion to Suppress Evidence: If evidence was obtained as a result of an illegal search or seizure, the attorney can argue that it is inadmissible in court under the "exclusionary rule," weakening the prosecution's case.
• Challenging the Validity of the Warrant: If the warrant was issued without probable cause, was overly broad, or was based on false information, the evidence obtained under it can be excluded.
• Filing a Motion for Dismissal of Charges: In some cases, Fourth Amendment violations may justify dismissing charges altogether. For instance, if the prosecution's case relies heavily on evidence that is later suppressed, the lack of evidence may compel the court to dismiss the case.

For more information, contact Eisner Gorin LLP, a federal criminal defense law firm based in Los Angeles, California.

Related Content:

• Are Dog-Sniffing Dogs Lawful?
• Search Locked Glove Compartment
• Fourth Amendment Landmark Cases
• Search & Seizure Supreme Court Cases
• What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean?
• Title III Applications for Electronic Surveillance