Call Today! Free Immediate Response (818) 781-1570

Blog

Can Police Search Your Vehicle Without a Warrant?

Posted by Dmitry Gorin | Nov 28, 2024

Let's examine whether police in California can search your car without a warrant or your consent. Understanding your rights during a traffic stop is not only important but also empowering. It can be crucial, especially if law enforcement decides to search your vehicle. Remember, you're not alone in this.

If you believe your rights were violated, it's important to consult an attorney who can guide you through the process.

The U.S. Constitution, a beacon of protection, firmly shields individuals against "unreasonable searches and seizures." This robust protection ensures your security. But what exactly qualifies as unreasonable? When you're pulled over, can police legally search your car without a warrant or your consent? And if they do, what options do you have?

Can Police Search Your Vehicle Without a Warrant?
Law enforcement officers are allowed to search a vehicle without a warrant under specific circumstances.

Law enforcement is allowed to search a vehicle without a warrant under specific circumstances. These include having the owner's consent, probable cause to believe it contains evidence of a crime, conducting a search incident to a lawful arrest, or performing an inventory of an impounded vehicle.

Suppose evidence is obtained from an unlawful search. In that case, it might be excluded through a Penal Code 1538.5 PC motion to suppress.

Simply put, police officers can legally search your car if you consent, and they can search if they have probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime.

Search and seizure laws regarding vehicles are related to Fourth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. As noted, this Amendment provides that you have the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Suppose law enforcement searches a vehicle without the legal right to do so. In that case, you could attempt to suppress any evidence that the police found.

Suppression means that a judge might exclude the evidence from the case. Exclusion means that any charges might get reduced or dismissed altogether.

Under California law, the general rule is that police can search a car if they have a valid warrant or a certain exception to the warrant requirement applies. If law enforcement collects evidence in violation of these rules, then you can file a motion to suppress to exclude any evidence that was gathered unlawfully.

When are Police Allowed to Search a Car?

Police can always search a car if they have a legal warrant. They can even search a car without a warrant in certain situations, called a "warrantless search," such as the following:

  • You or someone with control over the vehicle gives consent to a search.
  • The police have probable cause the car has evidence of criminal activity.
  • Police arrest you from the vehicle, and there is a search incident to arrest.
  • Police temporarily detain you in the car, and they lawfully impound the vehicle and conduct an inventory search.

Police can search a car if they do so pursuant to a valid search warrant as long as it was signed by a judge, based upon probable cause, describes specifically the vehicle to be searched, and describes specifically the property or thing that is being searched for.

As noted, police may search a vehicle if they have probable cause to believe there is evidence of a crime inside. This is called the "vehicle exception" to the general rule, which states that searches require a warrant.

The reasons for the exception are that the car can be moved quickly and that evidence can get lost while a warrant is obtained. Notably, you have a reduced expectation of privacy in a car compared to your home. Probable cause means that police know certain facts which would justify the issuance of a warrant to search the car.

What are Fourth Amendment Protections?

The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution is designed to protect citizens from invasive or arbitrary government searches. Specifically, it prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and usually requires a warrant based on probable cause for a search to occur.

However, the Supreme Court has recognized that automobiles have a lower expectation of privacy compared to homes, mainly due to their mobility and the fact that they operate on public roads.

This has led to a set of exceptions that allow police officers to search a vehicle without a warrant. Common exceptions include:

  • Probable Cause: If an officer has a good reason to believe a vehicle contains evidence of a crime, they can search it without a warrant. This 'good reason' is based on factual evidence or specific circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime has occurred or is occurring.
  • Search Incident to Arrest: If an individual in the vehicle is being arrested, police can search the passenger compartment or trunk for weapons or evidence related to the arrest.
  • Plain View Doctrine: If an officer sees evidence of a crime in "plain view" while lawfully conducting a traffic stop, they can seize that evidence and may search the vehicle further based on probable cause.
  • Exigent Circumstances: In situations where an officer believes that evidence could be destroyed or removed before obtaining a warrant, they may search without one. For instance, if an officer sees a suspect trying to throw a bag of drugs out of a car window, they can search the car without a warrant to prevent the destruction of evidence.

Nevertheless, you have rights regarding the illegal search of your vehicle. Police do have boundaries they must maintain, and if you have given law enforcement no probable cause, they are not permitted to search your vehicle at will. If they do, it's a violation of your rights.

What are Some Examples?

EXAMPLE 1: David is pulled over for speeding. As the officer approaches David's vehicle, he notices a strong smell of marijuana emanating from the car. Based on this smell, the officer may have probable cause to believe there are illegal substances in the vehicle and is legally permitted to search areas of the vehicle where he believes the drugs might be located.

EXAMPLE 2: Alice is pulled over for a broken taillight-a minor traffic violation. During the stop, the officer asks Alice if she can search the vehicle. Alice declines, exercising her right not to consent to a search. The officer insists and begins searching the car without observing any evidence or behavior indicating a crime.

In this case, the search is likely unlawful because a broken taillight generally does not provide evidence of some other crime, and therefore, no probable cause exists.

Challenging an Unlawful Search in California

If you believe that your vehicle was searched unlawfully, remember that you have the right to challenge it. You can do this by filing a motion to suppress, which is a legal request to exclude evidence obtained from an unlawful search. It is essential to consult a criminal defense attorney who can help you protect your rights.

In California, an attorney can employ several legal strategies to challenge evidence obtained from an unlawful search, potentially leading to the suppression of the evidence or even the dismissal of charges. These include:

  • Motion to Suppress Evidence: A criminal defense attorney can file a motion to suppress any evidence obtained during an unlawful search. This motion requests that the court exclude evidence on the grounds that it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. If the court grants the motion, the prosecution may lose access to critical evidence, which could weaken their case or even render it unviable.
  • Arguing Lack of Probable Cause or Exigent Circumstances: A defense attorney may also challenge the specific basis of the officer's decision to search. If the police claimed probable cause, your attorney might argue that there was insufficient evidence to justify it.
  • Cross-examination of Law Enforcement: In some cases, the details of the search may hinge on the credibility of the law enforcement officer's account. Your attorney might cross-examine the officer during a suppression hearing to expose inconsistencies or biases in their reasoning. For instance, if the officer claimed that they detected the odor of marijuana but did not find any, this could raise questions about the truthfulness of their claim.

For additional information, contact our California criminal defense lawyers, Eisner Gorin LLP, based in Los Angeles.

Related Content:

About the Author

Dmitry Gorin

Dmitry Gorin is a licensed attorney, who has been involved in criminal trial work and pretrial litigation since 1994. Before becoming partner in Eisner Gorin LLP, Mr. Gorin was a Senior Deputy District Attorney in Los Angeles Courts for more than ten years. As a criminal tri...

We speak English, Russian, Armenian, and Spanish.

Attorney Dmitry Gorin If you have one phone call from jail, call us! If you are facing criminal charges, DON'T talk to the police first. TALK TO US!

CALL TOLL-FREE
(818) 781-1570
Anytime 24/7

Menu